Knowledge, as defined by the Websters Encyclopedic Unabridged lexicon is the acquaintance with facts, truths or principles. When using this definition to determine a Marxian and Durkheimian theory of noesis, one(a) must break it down into its triple themes and analyze them separately. Durkheim deems righteousness indispensable for the procurement of knowledge and sees religious belief as essential to the function of society. Marx argues that knowledge is restricted by religion, and religion oppresses its associates with a false sense of commit. This study will further explore their diverse perceptions of the theory of knowledge through its intimate and arguably indispensable or bad ties to religion.
Marx believes that the private understands the facts of his/her life, but is too numbed by false hope to be able change them. If according to Marx, what one does is more(prenominal) important than what one thinks, when one is scarcely thinking about(predicate) their personal suffering, they are subsequently non doing anything about it. By not acting upon ones own ideas, there remains the only option of following the lead of others.
When ones consciousness is governed by ones being, and the individual in question is but a mere follower for not acting upon his own ideas, would this not incite Marxs beguile of knowledge as being controlled by the group, and restricted by religion; as following is the essence of religion? When Marx state that he despised all Gods, as they do not recognize mans self-consciousness as the highest of divinity, he implies that religion makes one cravenly submissive to the subscribeance without question of their status quo. He believes that religion takes away all that is venerable in humans, forcing one to accept generalized facts of our society, leaving a bitter taste of discouragement and a false hope for a brighter life...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment