The Hudsons Bay Company :: essays research papers fc

Lawmaking is a complicated, complex and comprehensive process which involves the locating, focvictimization and direct of tender overlook. There are strong theories about the essence of kindly control. Some sociologists have even concluded that social control as a innovation should be discarded totally beca work its power as an analytical tool was weakened through an unhealthy combination of utilize and under-explanation. As Chunn and Gavigan point out, it is not sufficient to use social control as an analytic tool when wholeness begins with the approach that (1) either the sum of the concept is too obvious to need definition or (2) the concept is undefinable but can be used without being defined. For the purposes of this study, an attempt will be made to examine the dialectical relationship surrounded by legal power and social control using the Hudsons utter Companys large jurisdiction over a large part of North America. The menstruation under study is from the Companys chartering in 1670 until 1821, when a new regulatory map was passed. An examination of the legal system which was operative in the late seventeenth and entire 18th century in Ruperts Land offers insight into the root of the Canadian legal process. In spite of the corporate nature of the Company-run Ruperts Land, I believe that a close study of legal questions, cases and decisions that arose during the Companys first one hundred and fifty years will indicate that all the social control mechanisms were not in the Companys hands. Rather a synergy between the Company and the frontierspeople determined the nature of the laws.To cope with the above-mentioned difficulties in using social control as an analytical tool, I plan to use the conceptual theme of social controls suggested by Russell Smandych. Smandychs approach returns analytical utility to the social control concept. He examines the layers, levels, nuances, and threads of social control that two define and confine behavior. H e takes social control analysis a necessary extra step by recognizing that it is not an entirety in and of itself but that it is a collection of controls, each operating at a different level. And rather than using the controls found in a caller as explanations of that society, Smandych recommends using the possibility of these controls as analytical devices for restudying and rethinking a society.The Hudsons utter Company was entitled to handle all law making, enforcement, and execution from 1670 until 1870. Because the Hudsons Bay Company was working with a tabula rasa (especially as it did not give friendship to aboriginal laws), judicially speaking, it offers a prime example for viewing the reading of law from step one.